Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(authority): adjust permissions to be more restrictive #2542

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jul 25, 2024

Conversation

lumtis
Copy link
Member

@lumtis lumtis commented Jul 24, 2024

Description

Closes: #2430

Add some messages under admin policy type instead of operational policy type

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced security through more restrictive permission settings, impacting user interactions and requiring additional validation for certain operations.
    • Reintroduction of message URLs to the Admin Policy, allowing for more administrative operations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Restructured message types between Operational and Admin Policy lists for clearer authorization logic.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent updates focus on enhancing security by modifying permissions and reclassifying message types within the system. Key changes involve making permission settings more restrictive and effectively reorganizing the categorization of specific message types to better align with their operational risks. This restructuring aims to bolster administrative capabilities while ensuring that high-risk messages are managed under appropriate policies.

Changes

Files Change Summary
changelog.md Updated to reflect more restrictive permission settings aimed at enhancing security.
x/authority/types/authorization_list.go Reintroduced message URLs to AdminPolicyMessages, enhancing administrative capabilities.
x/authority/types/authorization_list_test.go Reorganized message types, moving several from OperationalPolicyMessageList to AdminPolicyMessageList, refining authorization logic.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Adjust categorization of high-risk messages to the Admin group (#[2430])
Ensure MsgRemoveForeignCoin and MsgAddObserver are moved to Admin group due to their impacts (#[2430])

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lumtis lumtis added UPGRADE_TESTS Run make start-upgrade-tests ADMIN_TESTS Run make start-admin-tests labels Jul 24, 2024
@lumtis lumtis marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2024 12:29
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c39726 and e79695f.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • changelog.md (1 hunks)
  • x/authority/types/authorization_list.go (1 hunks)
  • x/authority/types/authorization_list_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
x/authority/types/authorization_list.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

x/authority/types/authorization_list_test.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Go code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.

Additional comments not posted (13)
x/authority/types/authorization_list.go (6)

28-28: Ensure MsgWhitelistERC20 is correctly categorized under AdminPolicyMessages.

Adding MsgWhitelistERC20 to the admin policy ensures that only authorized personnel can execute this operation, which is appropriate given its potential impact on the network.


31-31: Verify the categorization of MsgRemoveForeignCoin under AdminPolicyMessages.

This message has significant implications, such as potentially deleting supply. Its inclusion in the admin policy is appropriate, but ensure that all necessary safeguards are in place.


32-32: Confirm MsgDeployFungibleCoinZRC20 is suitable for AdminPolicyMessages.

Deploying fungible coins should be restricted to admin-level permissions due to its high impact. This categorization seems appropriate.


34-34: Check the impact of MsgAddObserver under AdminPolicyMessages.

Adding observers can affect the network's monitoring and signing processes. Ensure that this categorization aligns with the intended security model.


35-35: Assess MsgRemoveChainParams for AdminPolicyMessages.

Removing chain parameters can have critical effects. It is appropriate to restrict this operation to admin-level permissions.


39-39: Validate MsgEnableHeaderVerification under AdminPolicyMessages.

Enabling header verification is a sensitive operation that should be restricted to admins. This categorization is suitable.

x/authority/types/authorization_list_test.go (6)

419-419: Confirm MsgWhitelistERC20 is correctly moved to AdminPolicyMessageList.

This change ensures that only admin-level permissions can whitelist ERC20 tokens, which is appropriate.


420-420: Verify MsgDeployFungibleCoinZRC20 is correctly moved to AdminPolicyMessageList.

Deploying fungible coins should be restricted to admin-level permissions due to its high impact. This change is appropriate.


423-423: Check the movement of MsgRemoveForeignCoin to AdminPolicyMessageList.

Given the significant implications of removing foreign coins, this change ensures that only authorized personnel can perform this operation.


425-425: Assess MsgAddObserver in AdminPolicyMessageList.

Adding observers can affect the network's monitoring and signing processes. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended security model.


426-426: Validate MsgRemoveChainParams in AdminPolicyMessageList.

Removing chain parameters can have critical effects. This change appropriately restricts this operation to admin-level permissions.


430-430: Confirm MsgEnableHeaderVerification in AdminPolicyMessageList.

Enabling header verification is a sensitive operation that should be restricted to admins. This change is suitable.

changelog.md (1)

67-67: Changelog entry accurately reflects the permission changes.

The entry clearly indicates that permissions have been made more restrictive, aligning with the changes in the codebase.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 84 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 46.62%. Comparing base (a27aa9a) to head (f2da8c3).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2542      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    46.68%   46.62%   -0.06%     
===========================================
  Files          464      464              
  Lines        30781    30820      +39     
===========================================
  Hits         14369    14369              
- Misses       15557    15596      +39     
  Partials       855      855              
Files Coverage Δ
x/authority/types/authorization_list.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
e2e/runner/runner.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
e2e/e2etests/test_migrate_chain_support.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
e2e/runner/setup_zeta.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
e2e/txserver/zeta_tx_server.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@lumtis lumtis requested a review from swift1337 July 24, 2024 14:47
@lumtis lumtis enabled auto-merge July 25, 2024 10:19
@lumtis lumtis added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 43a2468 Jul 25, 2024
27 of 28 checks passed
@lumtis lumtis deleted the permissions-adjust branch July 25, 2024 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ADMIN_TESTS Run make start-admin-tests breaking:cli UPGRADE_TESTS Run make start-upgrade-tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adjust Operations Group Permissions
3 participants