Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#222, #288: Update SHACL-SHACL for general NodeExpression and SelectExpression #302

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: gh-pages
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is built on a not-currently-merged state of #297 . 297 should be merged before this.

This PR is scoped to SHACL-SHACL updates specific to #222 and #288 . A group decision is not in place on by when this should be merged, or if it blocks PRs or Issues.

This PR is also in a draft status while updates are made over 6bf5a7c, in response to comments on this commit.

HolgerKnublauch and others added 4 commits March 4, 2025 11:15
…lectExpression

This patch undoes commit 8632a3e.  This was done manually instead of with `git revert`.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
…xpression

This is a re-application of commit 8632a3e, done so it can be reviewed
in a separate Pull Request.

Signed-off-by: Alex Nelson <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@TallTed TallTed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo

@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

@TallTed , thanks for the peek at this PR. I hadn't intended to request review yet. The PR is intentionally in draft as I think through some syntax things and review some classes.

@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor Author

@TallTed , thanks for the peek at this PR. I hadn't intended to request review yet. The PR is intentionally in draft as I think through some syntax things and review some classes.

...Actually, I'm curious - did you actually comment on this PR (302), or did you just comment once on PR 297?

I'm curious if it was actually the latter, and GitHub did an interesting propagation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants