Inspector tabs

[davetsay]

Closes #6118

Describe your changes:

• register all hardcoded inspector views with inspectorViewRegistry
• views get their own tabs
• tabs have logic to hide/show based on selection and isEditing (only for now)

All Submissions:

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
• Is this change backwards compatible? For example, developers won't need to change how they are calling the API or how they've extended core plugins such as Tables or Plots.

Author Checklist

• Changes address original issue?
• Tests included and/or updated with changes?
• Command line build passes?
• Has this been smoke tested?
• Testing instructions included in associated issue OR is this a dependency/testcase change?

Reviewer Checklist

• Changes appear to address issue?
• Reviewer has tested changes by following the provided instructions?
• Changes appear not to be breaking changes?
• Appropriate automated tests included?
• Code style and in-line documentation are appropriate?
• Has associated issue been labelled unverified? (only applicable if this PR closes the issue)
• Has associated issue been labelled bug? (only applicable if this PR is for a bug fix)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #6137 (c2e5cfa) into master (8040b27) will decrease coverage by 0.21%.
The diff coverage is 80.37%.

❗ Current head c2e5cfa differs from pull request most recent head c956c78. Consider uploading reports for the commit c956c78 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6137      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.03%   54.82%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files         607      617      +10     
  Lines       26245    26346     +101     
  Branches     2395     2381      -14     
==========================================
+ Hits        14444    14445       +1     
- Misses      11137    11256     +119     
+ Partials      664      645      -19     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
e2e-ci	39.40% <ø> (-0.06%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 2986b45
e2e-full	51.15% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 2986b45
e2e-stable	53.87% <79.78%> (-0.48%)	⬇️
unit	49.36% <69.62%> (-0.25%)	⬇️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...rts/bar/inspector/BarGraphInspectorViewProvider.js	90.90% <0.00%> (ø)
...tter/inspector/ScatterPlotInspectorViewProvider.js	54.54% <0.00%> (-36.37%)	⬇️
...gins/condition/components/inspector/StylesView.vue	47.66% <ø> (-3.22%)	⬇️
...ns/displayLayout/AlphanumericFormatViewProvider.js	80.00% <ø> (ø)
...ns/displayLayout/components/AlphanumericFormat.vue	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...ugins/faultManagement/FaultManagementInspector.vue	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...Management/FaultManagementInspectorViewProvider.js	81.81% <0.00%> (ø)
...ctorViews/annotations/AnnotationsInspectorView.vue	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...gins/inspectorViews/annotations/tags/TagEditor.vue	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...s/inspectorViews/annotations/tags/TagSelection.vue	0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 51 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f388d9a...c956c78. Read the comment docs.

[ozyx]

Just a couple minor comments. This is looking really awesome.

[davetsay]

this should be good to go again. I just need to confirm with you that merge conflict resolution didn't bork annotations, @scottbell.

[davetsay]

@scottbell , when you get a chance. I'll need some help in knowing if I borked annotations

[scottbell]

Tested tags against notebooks, stacked plots, overlay plots, and search - looks good, Dave!