Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add auth mode param #171

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 4, 2018
Merged

add auth mode param #171

merged 3 commits into from
May 4, 2018

Conversation

Lagovas
Copy link
Collaborator

@Lagovas Lagovas commented May 4, 2018

add settings that change tls authentication mode. in AcraConnector it set how it will authenticate AcraServer in tls connection, on AcraServer side it setup how it will authenticate database in tls connection
plus updated tls configuration to provide other less strict authentication methods (not authenticate client from server, require any certificate, require and check) as it implemented in other places (for examples in dbs)

@Lagovas Lagovas requested review from vixentael and shadinua May 4, 2018 11:25
def get_connector_tls_params(self):
return [
'--tls',
'--tls_sni=acraserver',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we should not forget to rename this to acra-server in rename branch

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it doesn't matter here. at first - it is tests. and it's depends on values in certificate that used in tests

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh right, it's a value inside certificate 🙈

@vixentael vixentael added the core label May 4, 2018
@vixentael vixentael merged commit 4e90d59 into cossacklabs:master May 4, 2018
@Lagovas Lagovas deleted the lagovas/T580-add-auth-mode-param branch May 7, 2018 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants