Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PM-18890] Import errors cause permissions are reversed #5469

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

voommen-livefront
Copy link
Collaborator

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-18890

📔 Objective

Given a user, who is not the owner or admin of an organization, but has been giving privileges to Manage a collection, the user must be able to import into that org.
The reason for the failure is this:

  • if the user did not have ImportCipher privileges - the program would return no privilege
  • if the user did not have Create privileges - the program would return no privilege

This PR changes it to this:

  • if the user has Import Cipher privileges - then return 'yes`
  • Or if the user has Create privilege - then return yes

📸 Screenshots

None at this time

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@voommen-livefront voommen-livefront requested a review from a team as a code owner March 5, 2025 21:34
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 44.45%. Comparing base (63f1c3c) to head (7d6c279).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/Api/Tools/Controllers/ImportCiphersController.cs 60.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5469      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   44.45%   44.45%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1530     1530              
  Lines       70999    71021      +22     
  Branches     6372     6376       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        31562    31570       +8     
- Misses      38070    38083      +13     
- Partials     1367     1368       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Contributor

@djsmith85 djsmith85 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@voommen-livefront I previously, while working/debugging #5385 I came to the same solution, but it allows a user to create sub-collections within their managed collection. Something which currently we do not want to enable.

IMHO if we want to support this, then we should also enable members to create sub-collections within the organizational vault UI.

Lets discuss this offline with product again.

@djsmith85 djsmith85 changed the title PM-18890 Import errors cause permissions are reversed [PM-18890] Import errors cause permissions are reversed Mar 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details5fca966e-06a6-45f4-853c-5a6bb18efa1b

New Issues (8)

Checkmarx found the following issues in this Pull Request

Severity Issue Source File / Package Checkmarx Insight
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/Controllers/CollectionsController.cs: 171
detailsMethod Put at line 171 of /src/Api/Controllers/CollectionsController.cs gets a parameter from a user request from model. This parameter value flows...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM Privacy_Violation /src/Core/Auth/Services/Implementations/AuthRequestService.cs: 230
detailsMethod UpdateAuthRequestAsync at line 230 of /src/Core/Auth/Services/Implementations/AuthRequestService.cs sends user information outside the appli...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM Privacy_Violation /src/Core/Auth/Services/Implementations/AuthRequestService.cs: 221
detailsMethod UpdateAuthRequestAsync at line 221 of /src/Core/Auth/Services/Implementations/AuthRequestService.cs sends user information outside the appli...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM Privacy_Violation /src/Core/Auth/Services/Implementations/AuthRequestService.cs: 173
detailsMethod CreateAuthRequestAsync at line 173 of /src/Core/Auth/Services/Implementations/AuthRequestService.cs sends user information outside the appli...
Attack Vector
MEDIUM Privacy_Violation /src/Core/NotificationHub/NotificationHubPushNotificationService.cs: 306
detailsMethod PushAuthRequestAsync at line 306 of /src/Core/NotificationHub/NotificationHubPushNotificationService.cs sends user information outside the a...
Attack Vector
LOW Log_Forging /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs: 56
detailsMethod PostIpn at line 56 of /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs gets user input from element model. This element’s value flows through th...
Attack Vector
LOW Log_Forging /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs: 56
detailsMethod PostIpn at line 56 of /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs gets user input from element model. This element’s value flows through th...
Attack Vector
LOW Log_Forging /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs: 56
detailsMethod PostIpn at line 56 of /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs gets user input from element model. This element’s value flows through th...
Attack Vector
Fixed Issues (7)

Great job! The following issues were fixed in this Pull Request

Severity Issue Source File / Package
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/AdminConsole/Controllers/GroupsController.cs: 164
MEDIUM CSRF /bitwarden_license/src/Scim/Controllers/v2/GroupsController.cs: 104
MEDIUM CSRF /src/Api/AdminConsole/Public/Controllers/GroupsController.cs: 133
MEDIUM CSRF /bitwarden_license/src/Scim/Controllers/v2/GroupsController.cs: 94
LOW Log_Forging /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs: 57
LOW Log_Forging /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs: 57
LOW Log_Forging /src/Billing/Controllers/BitPayController.cs: 57

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants