-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Raising error on missing configuration file inclusion #3498
Conversation
It seems fine to add a warning along these lines! I think I'd lean toward just a warning, however, rather than exiting with a traceback. Also, note that we already handle |
Ok for the warning (no traceback) part. However, I think the decision to make here is if a missing configuration file constitutes to a bad-enough situation for which we want to interrupt the execution or not. In my opinion it does because the application would behave differently from how I would expect it to do with all the configuration files loaded. |
I guess I feel pretty agnostic about that precise distinction? But one argument for leaving it as a warning is to be less disruptive to people who were relying on the old behavior, who will now just get a warning when they run beets instead of being prevented from running it altogether… you could have an |
Ok. I see your point. Let's go with a simple warning then. |
This, with the following configuration: include:
- inexistent.yml produces: $ ./beet
Warning! Missing configuration file! [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/Users/jackisback/.config/beets/DEVEL/inexistent.yml'
Usage:
beet COMMAND [ARGS...]
beet help COMMAND
... and beets keeps running happily ;) However, it does not catch badly formatted configuration files. With: include:
- badformat.yml and with the 'badformat.yml' file: this
will
not
pass
as
ok
yml I expected the same warning to show because the $ ./beet
configuration error: musicbrainz.host not found and beets exits. But maybe this needs a separate PR. |
Great; thanks for continuing to sort this out! A few random things:
I am also a tad confused by the issue with the malformed YAML… I would have expected that to throw an error too. Maybe we should dig into why that's not happening! |
Sure, no worries. As for the malformed yaml issue I will open a separate issue (also referencing this PR) and we can dig into it. It seems odd. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good! Could you please add a quick changelog entry?
Hi @sampsyo. This one: docs/changelog.rst? Can you please give me an advice on what editor to use to edit rst files? I have not used this format before and I don't want to mess it up. tnx |
Looks like you got it; thanks!! I don't have specific text editor recommendations for editing ReST files (I just use vim 😃), but you might consider previewing changes to the docs. You can generate the HTML files by typing |
I think it is better to know than ignoring it silently. I don't know how you feel about this but I am requesting this PR because I lost a good deal of time convinced that my configuration was read only to discover that I mistyped the path. We could also opt for a 'softer' warning...