Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow specifying number of optimization runs #1662

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 2, 2019

Conversation

ayrat555
Copy link
Contributor

@ayrat555 ayrat555 commented Mar 27, 2019

when verifying a contact we should allow a user to specify the number of optimization runs. Currently, 200 is used

Changelog

  • allow specifying number of optimization runs

@ghost ghost assigned ayrat555 Mar 27, 2019
@ghost ghost added the in progress label Mar 27, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 27, 2019

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 654a390c-44ab-4d90-b826-d2bd02ef0c8d

  • 12 of 12 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.03%) to 83.15%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build a9d9ac3a-030b-46f1-a390-b519a115d770: 0.03%
Covered Lines: 4461
Relevant Lines: 5365

💛 - Coveralls

@ayrat555 ayrat555 force-pushed the ab-specify-number-of-optimization-runs branch from c29021a to b60ca17 Compare March 28, 2019 09:22
@ayrat555 ayrat555 changed the title [WIP] allow specifying number of optimization runs allow specifying number of optimization runs Mar 28, 2019
@ayrat555 ayrat555 force-pushed the ab-specify-number-of-optimization-runs branch from 512f225 to 318dbae Compare April 2, 2019 09:43
@ayrat555 ayrat555 merged commit e7187d6 into master Apr 2, 2019
@ayrat555 ayrat555 deleted the ab-specify-number-of-optimization-runs branch April 2, 2019 14:26
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label Apr 2, 2019
This was referenced Apr 3, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants