-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 429
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: allow ignore conflicts on scheduled change #4590
feat: allow ignore conflicts on scheduled change #4590
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
Docker builds report
|
Uffizzi Preview |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4590 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.15% 97.15%
=======================================
Files 1156 1157 +1
Lines 39934 39994 +60
=======================================
+ Hits 38797 38857 +60
Misses 1137 1137 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One question
Changes
This PR sets out to resolve an issue where it's not possible to schedule consecutive change requests on the same feature. For example, in the case where you want to schedule a slow roll out by changing the segment override on a feature to a different percentage value.
To achieve this, I have added a value to the ChangeRequest model which allows the creator to ignore conflicts.
Currently the use case given in the test will only really be useful when using the API directly but this is the use case for a current customer.
How did you test this code?
Added one long integration style test to test the exact use case for a customer.