Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(revert): "feat(rate-limit): enable rate limit in production (#3362)" #3381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

gagantrivedi
Copy link
Member

@gagantrivedi gagantrivedi commented Feb 5, 2024

This reverts commit f9545f7.

Thanks for submitting a PR! Please check the boxes below:

  • I have run pre-commit to check linting
  • I have added information to docs/ if required so people know about the feature!
  • I have filled in the "Changes" section below?
  • I have filled in the "How did you test this code" section below?
  • I have used a Conventional Commit title for this Pull Request

Changes

Disable Rate limit in production

How did you test this code?

N/A

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 5, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2024 2:22pm
flagsmith-frontend-preview 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Feb 5, 2024 2:22pm
flagsmith-frontend-staging ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2024 2:22pm

@gagantrivedi gagantrivedi marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2024 14:18
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2024

Uffizzi Preview deployment-45868 was deleted.

@matthewelwell matthewelwell added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit ea3bc3c Feb 5, 2024
10 checks passed
@matthewelwell matthewelwell deleted the fix/disable-redis-in-prod branch February 5, 2024 14:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants